Christopher O. Tollefsen (tollefsen-c)

Contributions to Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2000a. “McDowell’s Moral Realism and the Secondary Quality Analogy.” Disputatio s/n(8): 30–42.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2000b. “Direct and Indirect Action revisited.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74(4): 653–670.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2004. “Basic Goods, Practical Insight, and External Reasons.” in Human Values. New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law, edited by David S. Oderberg and Sophie Grace Chappell, pp. 32–51. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Published under the name “Timothy Chappell” .
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2006. “Persons in Time.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80(1): 107–123.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2009. “No Problem: A Response to Bernard Prusak’s ‘The Problem with the Problem of the Embryo’ .” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83(4): 583–591.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2011. “Some Questions for Philosophical Embryology.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85(3): 447–464.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2012. “Augustine, Aquinas, and the Absolute Norm Against Lying.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86(1): 111–134.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2013a. “Response to O’Brien and Koons (2012).” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87(4): 751–778.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2013b. “In Vitro Fertilization should Not Be an Option for a Woman.” in Contemporary Debates in Bioethics, edited by Arthur L. Caplan and Robert Arp, pp. 451–459. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy n. 13. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2015a. “Double Effect and Two Hard Cases in Medical Ethics.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89(3): 407–420.
Tollefsen, Christopher O. 2015b. “Social Ontology.” in Philosophy of Social Science. A New Introduction, edited by Nancy Cartwright and Eleonora Montuschi, pp. 85–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Further References

O’Brien, Michael B. and Koons, Robert C. 2012. “Objects of Intention: A Hylomorphic Critique of the New Natural Law Theory.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86(4): 655–703.