Charles A. Baylis (baylis-ca)
Contributi a Philosophie.ch
No contributions yet
Bibliography
Baylis, Charles A. 1929. “Internality and Interdependence.” The Journal of Philosophy 26(14): 373–379.
Baylis, Charles A. 1930. “Meanings and their Exemplifications.” The Journal of Philosophy 27(7): 169–174.
Baylis, Charles A. 1935. “The Nature of Evidential Weight.” The Journal of Philosophy 32(11): 281–286.
Baylis, Charles A. 1940. “How to Make Our Ideas Clearer.” The Journal of Philosophy 37(9): 225–232.
Baylis, Charles A. 1947. “Review of Will (1947).” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 13(1): 57–58.
Baylis, Charles A. 1948. “Facts, Propositions, Exemplification and Truth.” Mind 57: 459–479.
Baylis, Charles A. 1949. “Review of Hampshire (1948).” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 14(3): 203.
Baylis, Charles A. 1950. “Rational Preference, Determinism, and Moral Obligation.” The Journal of Philosophy 47(3): 57–63.
Baylis, Charles A. 1951a. “Universals, Communicable Knowledge, and Metaphysics.” The Journal of Philosophy 48: 636–643.
Baylis, Charles A. 1951b. “Review of O’Connor (1951).” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 16(4): 301–302.
Baylis, Charles A. 1956. “Review of Chisholm (1955).” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 21(1): 86–87.
Baylis, Charles A. 1957. “Comments [on the symposium ‘Logical Subjects and Physical Objects’].” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17(4): 483–487.
Baylis, Charles A. 1966. “Foundations for a Presentative Theory of Perception and Sensation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66: 41–54.
Baylis, Charles A. 1968. “Lewis’ Theory of Facts.” in The Philosophy of C.I. Lewis, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, pp. 201–222. The Library of Living Philosophers n. 13. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co.
Further References
Chisholm, Roderick M. 1955. “Law Statements and Counterfactual Inference.” Analysis 15(5): 97–105.
Hampshire, Stuart. 1948. “Subjunctive Conditionals.” Analysis 9(1): 11.
O’Connor, Daniel John. 1951. “The Analysis of Conditional Sentences.” Mind 60: 351–362.
Will, Frederick L. 1947. “The Contrary-to-Fact Conditional.” Mind 56: 236–249.