Kein Profilbild | No profile picture | Utilisateur n'as pas d'image
https://www.philosophie.ch/profil/macbride

Fraser MacBride (macbride)

Bibliography

    Beebee, Helen and MacBride, Fraser. 2015. De Re Modality, Essentialism, and Lewis’s Humeanism.” in A Companion to David Lewis, edited by Barry C. Loewer and Jonathan Schaffer, pp. 220–236. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc., doi:10.1002/9781118398593.
    Janssen-Lauret, Frederique and MacBride, Fraser. 2018. David Lewis’s Place in the History of Late Analytic Philosophy: His Conservative and Liberal Methodology.” Philosophical Inquiries 5(1): 1–22.
    Janssen-Lauret, Frederique and MacBride, Fraser. 2020. Lewis’s Global Descriptivism and Reference Magnetism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98(1): 192–198.
    MacBride, Fraser. 1996. Review of Bacon, Campbell and Reinhardt (1993).” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47(3): 463–466.
    MacBride, Fraser. 1998a. Where are Particulars and Universals? Dialectica 52(3): 203–228.
    MacBride, Fraser. 1998b. On How we Know What There Is.” Analysis 58(1): 27–37.
    MacBride, Fraser. 1999a. Could Armstrong have been a Universal? Mind 108(431): 471–501.
    MacBride, Fraser. 1999b. Listening to Fictions: A Study of Fieldian Nominalism.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 431–455.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2000. On Finite Hume.” Philosophia Mathematica 8(2): 150–159. Reprinted in Cook (2007, 85–94).
    MacBride, Fraser. 2001a. Four New Ways to Change Your Shape.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2001b. Can the Property Boom Last? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101: 225–246.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2002a. In Search of the Particular-Universal Distinction.” Talk given at the university of Geneva, November 2002.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2002b. Could Nothing Matter? Analysis 62: 125–135. Reprinted in Cook (2007, 95–104).
    MacBride, Fraser. 2002c. The Problem of Universals and the Limits of Truth-Making.” Philosophical Papers 31(1): 27–37.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2002d. Truth-Making and Analysis: A Reply to Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002b).” Philosophical Papers 31(1): 49–61.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2002e. Facts and Universals [review of Hochberg (2001)].” Grazer Philosophische Studien 65: 207–222. “Mental Causation, Multiple Realization, and Emergence,” ed. by Marc Slors and Sven Walter.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2003. Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo-Logicism.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54(1): 103–163.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2004a. Particulars, Modes and Universals: An Examination of E.J. Lowe’s Four-Fold Ontology.” Dialectica 58(3): 317–334.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2004b. Whence the Particular-Universal Distinction? Grazer Philosophische Studien 67: 181–194.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2004c. Introduction.” The Philosophical Quarterly 54(214): 1–15.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2004d. Review of Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002a).” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2004e. Can Structuralism Solve the ‘Access’ Problem? Analysis 64(4): 309–317.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005a. Ramsey on Universals.” in Ramsey’s Legacy, edited by Hallvard Lillehammer and David Hugh Mellor, pp. 83–104. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005b. Negation and Predication: A Defence of Ramsey’s Thesis.” Metaphysica – special issue 3: 61–88.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005c. Two Theories of Modality. A Reply to von Wachter (2004).” Metaphysica 6(1): 111–127.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005d. Lewis’s Animadversions on the Truthmakers Principle.” in Truthmakers. The Contemporary Debate, edited by Helen Beebee and Julian Dodd, pp. 117–140. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283569.001.0001.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005e. Structuralism Reconsidered.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, edited by Stewart Shapiro, pp. 563–589. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/0195148770.003.0018.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005f. The Particular-Universal Distinction: A Dogma of Metaphysics? Mind 114(455): 565–614, doi:10.1093/mind/fzi565.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005g. The Julio César Problem.” Dialectica 59(2): 223–236.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2005h. Review of Hochberg (2003).” Dialectica 59(1): 81–87.
    MacBride, Fraser, ed. 2006a. Identity and Modality. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2006b. What Constitutes the Numerical Diversity of Mathematical Objects? Analysis 66(1): 63–69.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2006c. The Julius Caesar Objection: More Problematic than Ever.” in Identity and Modality, edited by Fraser MacBride, pp. 174–202. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2006d. Introduction.” in Identity and Modality, edited by Fraser MacBride, pp. 1–10. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2006e. Predicates and Properties: An Examination of P.K. Sen’s Theory of Universals.” in Universals, Concepts and Qualities: New Essays on the Meaning of Predicates, edited by Peter Frederick Strawson and Arindam Chakrabarti, pp. 67–90. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, doi:10.4324/9781315235325 .
    MacBride, Fraser. 2006f. Predicate Reference.” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by Ernest LePore and Barry C. Smith, pp. 422–475. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0019.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2007. Neutral Relations Revisited.” Dialectica 61(1): 25–56, doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01092.x.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2008. Can Ante Rem Structuralism Solve the Access Problem? The Philosophical Quarterly 58(230): 155–164.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2009. Universals: The Contemporary Debate.” in The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Robin Le Poidevin, Peter M. Simons, Andrew McGonigal, and Ross P. Cameron, pp. 276–285. Routledge Philosophy Companions. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780203879306.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2011a. Relations and Truth-Making.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111(1): 159–177.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2011b. Extreme Metaphysics: Hossack on Logical Objects, Facts, Propositions and Universals [on Hossack (2007)].” Dialectica 65(1): 87–101.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2011c. The Transcendental Metaphysics of G.F. Stout: His Defence and Elaboration of Trope Theory.” in Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan, edited by Anne Reboul. Genève: Département de philosophie, Université de Genève. Reprinted in Reboul (2014, 1: 141–158), http://kevin.philosophie.ch.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2011d. Impure Reference: A Way Around the Concept Horse Paradox.” in Philosophical Perspectives 25: Metaphysics, edited by John Hawthorne, pp. 297–312. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley; Sons, Inc., doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2011.00217.x.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2012a. Hochberg’s Micro-Metaphysical Relations: Order All the Way Down.” in Studies in the Philosophy of Herbert Hochberg, edited by Erwin Tegtmeier, pp. 87–110. EIDE – Foundations of Ontology n. 4. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, doi:10.1515/9783110330557.87.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2012b. The Cambridge Revolt against Idealism: Was there ever an Eden? Metaphilosophy 43(1–2): 135–146, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01736.x.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2012c. Philosophical Scepticism: Neither Friend Nor Foe but Frenemy.” in Scepticism: Hero and Villain, edited by Roy Y. Calne and William O’Reilly, pp. 159–169. World Philosophy Series. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2013a. Truthmakers.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/truthmakers/.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2013b. The Russell-Wittgenstein Dispute: A New Perspective.” in Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, edited by Mark Textor, pp. 206–241. History of Analytic Philosophy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, doi:10.1057/9781137286338.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2013c. For Keeping Truth in Truthmaking.” Analysis 73(4): 686–695.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2014a. How Involved Do You Want to Be in a Non-Symmetric Relationship? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92(1): 1–16, doi:10.1080/00048402.2013.788046.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2014b. Analytic Philosophy and its Synoptic Commission: Towards the Epistemic End of Days.” in Philosophical Traditions, edited by Anthony O’Hear, pp. 221–236. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement n. 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2014c. How Hochberg Helped Us Take the Ontological Turn: An Introduction.” Dialectica 68(2): 163–169.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2014d. How Truth Depends upon Being.” Analysis 74(3): 370–378.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2014e. Review of Gaskin (2008).” Mind 123(491): 898–901.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2014f. Review of Bostock (2012).” Mind 123(491): 873–876.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2015. On the Origins of Order: Non-Symmetric or only Symmetric Relations? in The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Gabrielle Galluzzo and Michael J. Loux, pp. 173–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781316181539.009.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2016a. Relations.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/relations/.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2016b. Neo-Fregean Meta-Ontology: Just Don’t Ask Too Many Questions.” in Abstractionism. Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics, edited by Philip A. Ebert and Marcus Rossberg, pp. 94–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645268.001.0001.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2018a. On the Genealogy of Universals. The Metaphysical Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198811251.001.0001.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2018b. Review of Marmodoro and Yates (2016).” Philosophy 93(1): 154–159.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2019. Truthmakers.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/truthmakers/.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2020a. Review of Soames (2018).” Dialectica 74(1), doi:10.48106/dial.v74.i1.08.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2020b. Relations.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/relations/.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2022. Converse Predicates and the Interpretation of Second Order Quantification.” Dialectica 76(2). Special issue “The Metaphysics of Relational States,” guest editor Jan Plate, doi:10.48106/dial.v76.i2.04.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2024a. The Early Wittgenstein’s Atomic Logic, Categories and the Necessary A Posteriori.” in Wittgenstein’s Pre-Tractatus Writings: Interpretations and Reappraisals, edited by Jimmy Plourde and Mathieu Marion. History of Analytic Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, doi:10.1057/9781137521729.
    MacBride, Fraser. 2024b. Against Second-Order Logic: Quine and Beyond.” in Higher-Order Metaphysics, edited by Peter Fritz and Nicholas K. Jones, pp. 378–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894885.003.0011.
    MacBride, Fraser and Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. 2015. Metaontology, Epistemology, and Essence: On the Empirical Deduction of the Categories.” The Monist 98(3): 290–302.
    MacBride, Fraser and Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. 2022. Why Lewis Would Have Rejected Grounding.” in Perspectives on the Philosophy of David K. Lewis, edited by Helen Beebee and Anthony Robert James Fisher, pp. 66–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oso/9780192845443.003.0005.
    MacBride, Fraser and Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. forthcoming. Metaphysical Determination, Analysis and Systematicity.” in Systematic Metaphysics: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Aaron Segal and Nicholas F. Stang. New York: Oxford University Press.
    MacBride, Fraser, Marion, Mathieu, Frápolli, Marı́a José, Edgington, Dorothy, Elliott, Edward, Lutz, Sebastian and Paris, Jeffrey Bruce. 2019. Frank Ramsey.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/ramsey/.
    MacBride, Fraser, Marion, Mathieu, Frápolli, Marı́a José, Edgington, Dorothy, Elliott, Edward, Lutz, Sebastian and Paris, Jeffrey Bruce. 2023. Frank Ramsey.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language; Information, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/ramsey/.
    MacBride, Fraser and Orilia, Francesco. 2022. Non-Symmetric Relation Names.” Dialectica 76(2). Special issue “The Metaphysics of Relational States,” guest editor Jan Plate, doi:10.48106/dial.v76.i2.06.
    MacBride, Fraser and Wright, Crispin, eds. forthcoming. Being Committed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Further References

    Bacon, John, Campbell, Keith and Reinhardt, Loyd R., eds. 1993. Ontology, Causality and Mind – Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bostock, David. 2012. Russell’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199651443.001.0001.
    Cook, Roy T., ed. 2007. The Arché Papers on the Mathematics of Abstraction. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science n. 71. Dordrecht: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4265-2.
    Gaskin, Richard. 2008. The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239450.001.0001.
    Hochberg, Herbert. 2001. Russell, Moore and Wittgenstein. The Revival of Realism. Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis n. 1. Heusenstamm b. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
    Hochberg, Herbert. 2003. Introducing Analytic Philosophy: Its Sense and Its Nonsense 1879–2002. Frankfurt a.M.: Hohenhausen AG.
    Hossack, Keith G. 2007. The Metaphysics of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206728.001.0001.
    Marmodoro, Anna and Yates, David, eds. 2016. The Metaphysics of Relations. Mind Association Occasional Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.001.0001.
    Reboul, Anne, ed. 2011. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. Genève: Département de philosophie, Université de Genève. Book publication: Reboul (2014), http://kevin.philosophie.ch.
    Reboul, Anne, ed. 2014. Mind, Values, and Metaphysics. Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan. vol. 1. Cham: Springer. Book publication of Reboul (2011).
    Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. 2002a. Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. 2002b. The Problem of Universals and the Limits of Conceptual Analysis.” Philosophical Papers 31(1): 39–47.
    Soames, Scott. 2018. The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy, Volume 2: A New Vision. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01267-3.
    von Wachter, Daniel. 2004. The Ontological Turn Misunderstood: How to Misunderstand David Armstrong’s Theory of Possibility.” Metaphysica 5(2): 105–114.