Milič Čapek (capek-m)

Contributions à Philosophie.ch

Bibliography

Čapek, Milič. 1950. “Stream of Consciousness and ‘durée réelle’ .” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10(3): 331–353.
Čapek, Milič. 1969. “Ernst Mach’s Biological Theory of Knowledge.” in Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 400–420. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 5. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3378-7.
Čapek, Milič. 1971a. Bergson and Modern Physics. A Reinterpretation and Re-evaluation. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 7. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1971b. “The Significance of Piaget’s Researches on the Psychogenesis of Atomism.” in PSA 1970: In Memory of Rudolf Carnap. Proceedings of the 1970 second Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Boston, Fall, 1970, edited by Roger C. Buck and Robert S. Cohen, pp. 446–455. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 8. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1971c. “The Fiction of Instants.” Studium Generale 24: 31–43. Reprinted in Fraser, Haber and Müller (1972, 332–344).
Čapek, Milič. 1973. “Two Types of Continuity.” in Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics. Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1969/1972, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 361–375. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 13. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1974. “Sur quelques résistances philosophiques à la physique du vingtième siècle.” Dialectica 28(3–4): 211–222.
Čapek, Milič, ed. 1976. The Concepts of Space and Time. Their Structure and Their Development. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 22. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1978. “Bergson, Nominalism, and Relativity [reply to Gunter (1975)].” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 9(3): 127–133.
Čapek, Milič. 1984a. “Particles or Events?” in Physical Sciences and History of Physics, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 1–28. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 82. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1984b. “Hegel and the Organic View of Nature.” in Hegel and the Sciences, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky, pp. 109–122. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 64. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1987. “The Philosophical Significance of Piaget’s Researches on the Genesis of the Concept of Time.” in Naturalistic Epistemology. A Symposium of Two Decades, edited by Abner E. Shimony and Debra Nails, pp. 91–111. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 100. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Čapek, Milič. 1988. “What Survives from the Classical Concept of Absolute Time.” in Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy, edited by Paul B. Scheurer and Guy Debrock, pp. 309–320. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées n. 123. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Čapek, Milič. 1991. The New Aspects of Time: Its Continuity and Novelties. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science n. 125. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Further References

Fraser, Julius Thomas, Haber, F. C. and Müller, Gert Heinz, eds. 1972. The Study of Time. Proceedings of the First Conference of the International Society for the Study of Time, Oberwolfach (Black Forest) – West Germany. New York: Springer.
Gunter, Pete A. Y. 1975. “Review of Čapek (1971a).” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 6(1): 155–166.