Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate

An international conference in philosophy of science,

Date: 30 June – 2 July 2025

Venue: Room S 201, University of Bern, Schanzeneckstrasse 1, 3012 Bern, Switzerland


The event will take place in a hybrid format, and participation is free of charge. To register, please email mahdi.khalili@unibe.ch by Friday, 20 June 2025, indicating whether you plan to attend in person or online.

For practical information and keynote abstracts, visit: philosophie.unibe.ch/realism

This conference is part of the project Extending the Scope of Causal Realism, supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. Additional funding for the Promotion of Early Career Researchers is provided by the University of Bern.

Organizing team: Matthias Egg, Mahdi Khalili, Frederick Britt


Program

Monday, 30 June

08.50 – 09.00 Welcome Address


09.00 – 10.15 Peter Vickers, Durham University

Five Epiphanies in the Quest for Scientific Truth


10.15 – 10.30 Coffee Break


10.30 – 11.15 Chrysi Malouchou Kanellopoulou, University of Edinburgh

To what Extent does Vickers’ Consensus-Based Approach Need Selective Realism?


11.15 – 12.30 Stathis Psillos (online) & Kosmas Brousalis, University of Athens

The ‘Localist’ Turn in the Scientific Realism Debate: A Critique


12.30 – 14.00 Lunch Break


14.00 – 14.45 Ludwig Fahrbach, University of Cologne

Beyond the Stalemate: New Directions in the Realism Debate


14.45 – 15.30 Yuyou Wu, University of Leeds

Dissolution or Enrichment? Evaluating the Impact of an Emerging Framework in Cognitive Science on the Scientific Realism Debate


15.30 – 16.00 Coffee Break


16.00 – 16.45 Bruno Malavolta e Silva, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Deflationary Scientific Realism


16.45 – 18.00 Kyle Stanford, University of California, Irvine

What’s Left of the Scientific Realism Debate?


Tuesday, 1 July

09.00 – 10.15 Leah Henderson, University of Groningen

What the ‘Local’ Approach to the Scientific Realism Debate is Good for


10.15 – 10.30 Coffee Break


10.30 – 11.15 Yukinori Onishi, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI

Epistemological Analysis of the Scientific Realism Debate


11.15 – 12.30 Anjan Chakravartty, University of Miami

Stances, Worldviews, and Philosophical Transformation


12.30 – 14.00 Lunch Break


14.00 – 14.45 Bobby Vos, University of Toronto

Explication as a Pathway to Philosophical Progress: The Case of the Scientific Realism Debate


14.45 – 15.30 Bruno Borge, University of Buenos Aires

Beyond the Impasse: Collaborative Epistemology and the Shared Ground of Realist and Empiricist Stances


15.30 – 16.00 Coffee Break


16.00 – 16.45 Mahdi Khalili, University of Bern

Is Stance Voluntarism Useful for Philosophical Debates?


16.45 – 18.00 Sandy Boucher, University of New England

The Stance-Dependence of Arguments for Scientific Realism


Wednesday, 2 July

09.00 – 10.15 Curtis Forbes

To be (or not to be) a Scientific Realist: Empirical Grounds for Prudential Reasons


10.15 – 10.30 Coffee Break


10.30 – 11.15 Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam, California State University, Northridge

On Stance-Transcendent Justification of Stance Choice: A Pluralist Perspective


11.15 – 12.45 Panel Discussion: Lessons and Prospects for the Debate


12.45 – 13.00 Closing Remarks